Can we drop this into existing workflows without re-platforming?

Yes. Fabriq sits as a policy layer across the systems a workflow already touches — ticketing, ERP, docs, email. Nothing about the applications changes; the actions between them start carrying limits, checkpoints, and a shared record.

Can limits follow the requesting employee across systems?

Yes — per-user authority travels with the workflow. The person who triggered it defines the budget, boundaries, and approvals that apply at every step, no matter which system or specialist agent is doing the work at that moment.

Can we stop a workflow mid-flight?

Yes. When a condition falls outside policy — an amount, a boundary crossing, a failed verification — the workflow pauses at that step. Later stages never run on the back of an unresolved exception.

How do we connect systems that aren’t off the shelf?

Import an OpenAPI spec, register an MCP server, or connect Postgres behind read-only guardrails — internal systems stay behind your firewall via an outbound-only tunnel.

What does the record show after the fact?

Each step of the workflow with who asked, which agent acted, and the verdict — so a bad run reconstructs in minutes, not from screenshots.

Can approvals sit inside an automated flow?

Yes — a step can hold for human sign-off while everything before and after stays automated; the hold and the decision are both logged.

Department · Operations

Control the actions behind end-to-end automation

Coordinate agents across business processes while preserving ownership, limits, and approvals.

Get a demo

The problem

Operational workflows rarely stay inside one system. A single agent may read a request, query inventory, contact a vendor, update an order, create a ticket, and notify a customer.

Each individual action may appear legitimate, but the complete workflow can cross ownership boundaries and create unintended consequences. Static application permissions cannot express the full business process.

Agentic Fabriq governs actions across the entire workflow.

Live workflow

See a real workflow, governed

Every agent below carries its own identity and acts for a real user. Watch every tool call route through Fabriq — then edit the workflow yourself.

An ops agent turns an internal purchase request into a Jira ticket and a NetSuite purchase order — anything over the team's budget needs manager approval.

agent: procops-bot-01

Purchase requestedinternal form

Procurement Ops Agentprocops-bot-01 · for: ops@acme.com

Agentic Fabriqidentity · policy · audit

Jiracreate request ticket

NetSuitecreate PO

Slacknotify requester

Drag nodes, draw connections, add tools — every agent action routes through Fabriq. Try wiring the agent straight to a tool.

The stakes

Why this is hard today

01One workflow touches inventory, vendors, orders, tickets, and customer emails — and no single system sees all of it.
02Every step looks fine on its own; it’s the combination that crosses a budget line or an ownership boundary.
03App-by-app permissions can’t say “approved vendors only, under budget, for this facility.”
04When an automated process goes wrong, untangling what happened across five systems takes days.

Capabilities

How Fabriq helps operations teams

Define the systems, resources, and actions available at each workflow stage.A stage-aware policy means the vendor-research step cannot place orders and the ordering step cannot rewrite vendor data.

Carry each user’s authority across every application in the workflow.The requester’s authority travels with the workflow, so each system sees the real initiator, not a super-user integration.

Require approval at financial, contractual, safety, or customer-impacting checkpoints.Checkpoints are declared once and enforced everywhere the workflow runs, regardless of which agent reaches them.

Restrict agents by facility, geography, business unit, vendor, or process.Operational boundaries become access boundaries — an agent for one plant or region ends there.

Coordinate specialist agents without losing the hand-off trail.Hand-offs between research, risk, and purchasing agents keep the original authority and its limits attached.

Stop or contain a workflow when conditions fall outside policy.A failed check pauses the chain mid-flight instead of letting later steps compound the problem.

Review the full sequence behind an operational outcome.The complete cross-system sequence reads as one record, from triggering request to final action.

In practice

Example workflows

approval: human approval

A vendor-onboarding agent that gathers documents but requires approval before activating the vendor.

Document gathering runs autonomously; vendor activation — the step with financial consequences — waits for a person.

logged

An order-exception agent that reroutes shipments within defined cost limits.

Rerouting authority is bounded by cost ceilings, so the fix for one exception cannot create a bigger one.

logged

A facilities agent that creates work orders but cannot authorize regulated maintenance.

Work orders open freely while regulated maintenance authorization stays with certified humans.

logged

A procurement workflow that passes bounded tasks between research, risk, and purchasing agents.

Each specialist agent receives only its slice of the process, and the hand-off trail ties the slices together.

Business value

Scalable cross-system automation without giving a single agent unchecked authority over the entire process.

Questions

Control the actions behind end-to-end automation

See a real workflow, governed

Why this is hard today

How Fabriq helps operations teams

Example workflows

Common questions